One of the main problems faced while selecting the most appropriate web hosting provider for your blog or site is an impossible-to-pass dilemma that is made between two web hosts. As you know, there are a lot of web hosts there in the industry, providing various kinds of web-hosting services, including the basic shared hosting and dedicated server hosting, for that matter. In the list, chances are high that Bluehost and SiteGround Hosting have caught you in a huge dilemma of selection. Both Bluehost and SiteGround Hosting have been in the industry for a while and it’s, as of now, two of the trusted names that professionals choose for their uncompromised needs. Read further to find out the verdict from our SiteGround vs Bluehost review.
SiteGround vs Bluehost Review
To help you get rid of the dilemma, we shall have a comparison of SiteGround Vs Bluehost Web Hosting. That way you can select the one that is best for your purpose! In this SiteGround vs Bluehost Review, we shall explore different aspects of each web host, such as performance, support, pricing, plans etc.
About the Firm
There is actually a tie between both the companies. Even though there is a difference of eight years as in terms of year of starting — SiteGround was started in 2004, while Bluehost has been in the industry from 1996 —, it actually does not matter in the long run. Quite impressively, the former is now providing a wide range of hosting options, to satisfy the versatile customer.
Website Loading Speed
Everyone wants their website to load quite quickly, so that their visitors won’t bounce! That is why the loading speed of web hosting server is important when we review a web host. In the case of Bluehost and SiteGround, it’s seen that websites hosted on SiteGround load a bit quickly than those in Bluehost. For instance, while a SiteGround-powered site takes less than two seconds to load; Bluehost-based one needs something more than two seconds to load.
So, it is good to choose SiteGround if you want extra speed while loading pages.
As per what is offered through the official websites, both web hosts — Bluehost and SiteGround — claim to offer an impressive uptime of 99.99%, according to the industry standard. Nevertheless, there is a slight different as it comes to the practice of both. As per what customers say, they have been seeing slight downtimes in Bluehost, thus causing some small issues. However, in case of SiteGround Hosting, it’s all good, because the promise of 99.99% uptime has been ensured, once again.
To sum up, we can say that SiteGround is the better choice if unobstructed uptime is your pivotal concern.
Performance & Server Response Time
From the webmaster’s point of view, you would be concerned about both these factors. Server Response Time is, as you know, the time taken for responding to the server request. Even when the best results of many tests are taken in to consideration, it seems that SiteGround has an upper hand and stability. There are no glitches or the lagging down stuff, but the whole process goes smoothly. In Bluehost, however, you may face some small issues with the server response time and performance, which is a bottleneck.
To conclude, we would say that Bluehost lags a bit behind SiteGround, thus making the latter the winner.
Plans & Pricing
To understand the affordability of both the web hosts, we shall have a look at the plans of shared web server hosting that is offered.
SiteGround has three plans in the shared package — StartUp, GrowBig, and GoGeek — available for monthly rates of $3.95, $7.95 and $14.95 respectively. The first plan is offering single-website hosting, but there are enough resources available. When we count in the awesome SiteGround Discount Coupons available, it becomes an awesome choice.
The shared web hosting sector of Bluehost too has three different plans to offer — which are named Basic, Plus and Business Pro. Different amount of resources are available, with a limit on websites that can be hosted. All the plans are offering unlimited bandwidth, which is a good thing.
We would say that both Bluehost and SiteGround are effective as in terms of affordability. It’s up to you to choose, according to other factors.
With Bluehost and SiteGround, you are going to have quality support through different methods such as live chatting and ticketing system along with toll-free number. However, the way both handle things is different, for that matter. It is seen that the customer support team of SiteGround is quicker than that of Bluehost, especially as we take the case of tickets and live chat response.
The Verdict in our SiteGround vs Bluehost Review
Except in the case of pricing, we give the edge to SiteGround for their service and features. So, we believe, it’s not the best decision to make a decision solely based on the cheaper option. If you are basing your preference on affordability, you can’t go wrong with Bluehost. However, for overall value regardless of price, we have to give the nod to SiteGround web hosting. They have the edge on the competition when it comes to performance, uptime and customer support management.